Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Social Network: A Brief Analysis


The Social Network is revelatory in many different ways, probably the least of which was the frustration that all the supposed “founders” felt. In the past when an idea was created we usually give credit to one man or one group. I think we fail to realize the scope of knowledge that can influence others; what is important is that one gets recognition first. Einstein’s theory of Relativity was also created by another scientist at the same time, but since Einstein worked at a patent office he had the chance to get there first.
The Social Network shows a part of our culture that changed the way we communicate. But it also is an interesting commentary on Auteur Theory; throughout the movie there were snippets of the multiple depositions Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) had to go to because he retained that Facebook was all his idea. Granted, he was the genius and creator behind the website. The Winklevoss twins did spur his creative process though, as well as his best friend Eduardo putting in the money (which technically was not even his but his father’s) to begin the website. All this leads to a question: Are ideas or money more important in today’s world?
Another one of the ways that this movie is unique is that in past disputes that changed the social structure of society never happened so fast, much less without any war or violence. If the creation of Facebook involved people from more than just one country who knows what could have happened? Other than that, Facebook spread over the internet literally like a virus. I had a Facebook by the beginning of my senior year of high school after getting an invite from a friend, which was in the end of 2005; about two years after the actual idea was conceived. What happened in those two years seemed to be happening so fast because of the acceptance of the idea itself. In the past the people who had certain ideas had to fight, go into exile and even die to prove their efficacy. Then there was the tasks of letting everyone else in the world know these genius’s/prophet’s/what-have-you’s deeds and ideas. But in today’s world of grand technological communication and more educated population, the good ideas seem to be accepted more easily. Those who stood in the way of the idea of “Facebook” can be likened to the Winklevoss brothers. Eduardo’s depositions with Mark (in the movie) only showed more depth to the story itself and how Mark had made himself more recognized for the idea. In this way Mark Zuckerberg can be seen as an “asshole” the way the film portrays him as.
The Movie itself is fun to watch, while the storyline is frequently interrupted by rooms of lawyers holding depositions of the main people trying to sue Mark Zuckerberg. These can be seen as modern day battle grounds. The more I think about it, the more the idea of Facebook stems all from a girl; the girl that breaks up with Mark in the very beginning of the movie. I do like the socks with sandals though; I wear the same thing often.

1 comment:

  1. Even though I haven't seen the movie yet, I find it funny (and almost ironic) that Facebook started out because of a bad breakup. Facebook is now filled with sappy statuses that are obviously reaching out to that one girl or boy that has done you wrong/doesn't know you exist/stolen your heart, and now is the source of a lot of Internet drama. I admit sometimes I'll post a pretty emo sounding status once in a while, but I am always amazed how much information people post about their own drama. We can't help but commiserate about our own lives online, and then lurk to how everyone else is doing in comparison. It's almost like song from the musical Avenue Q, Schadenfreude, "happiness at the misfortune of others." Other than that, I enjoyed reading your insight about the movie! Hopefully I'll be able to watch it at some point.

    ReplyDelete